Tutorial – How to identify fake trilobites.

by Dipl. Geol. Jens Koppka, Heiko Sonntag & Horst Burkard 2004

As trilobite collectors and preparators visiting many fossil shows and fairs we have had the chance to obtain some experience with fake trilobites. The knowledge we have gained over so many years allows us to quickly identify false material while it may be very difficult for others who are not so familiar with how fake trilobites are made. Unfortunately the trilobite market seems to be flooded with false stuff at the moment, the “quality” of which getting better continuously, making it even harder to tell. We therefore thought it a good idea to make our knowledge available to others in a way easily understood.
We also have to point out that there is no regime of control at the moment, as far as trilobite sales offers on the internet or on fairs are concerned, and no action taken against dealers who knowingly sell false material (like exclusion from shows and/or legal action). This unwelcomed situation almost encourages certain dealers to take advantage and the honest dealers are the ones who have to pay for it. Horst Burkard undertook to investigate many of the false trilobites coming from Morocco, using one of the most brutal methods available …. he took a saw! The results of his little massacre were on display during the Hamburg Fossil Show in 2003 and we had a chance to talk to him and take photos. The following text is by Jens Koppka, photos taken by Heiko Sonntag.

 

Historical Aspects

Faking trilobites is not any new business. Repairing, restoring, adding to or plain faking of fossils is almost as old as the fossil trade itself, the problem being, as with most areas of collecting, that money can be made and sometimes has to be made due to lack of other options and wide-spread poverty.
The famous 19th century trilobitologist BARRANDE employed what he called “rock men” to search the areas near Prague for trilobite specimens. Particularly interesting finds resulted in good money and some of those “rock men” could not help but fail their employer and produce false trilobites in order to get more money for them. With the beginning of the trilobite trade at the end of the 19th century many of these faked specimens found their way even into the collections of great museums around Europe where they are on display even today as refreshing curiosities (Budik & Turek, 2003).

A favoured way to fake trilobites was simply to assemble new specimens from parts, originating at times not only in different specimens but even in different genera, and thereby making the “trilobite” complete, resulting in higher prices when sold. Some of these “rare species”, which had been sold to museums and educational institutions, look quite grotesque in our time. There was, for example, a trilobite assembled from the cephalon of a Phacops, the pygidium being an Odontochile and the thorax consisting of merely 4 segments. (SNAJDR, 1992). However, at those times, the faked trilobites at least consisted of real parts. They were created in a “make-one-out-of-two”-manner but the parts were real. Fakes of this nature are created unto this very day, but the availability of resins made it possible to fake entire trilobites by simply casting them.

Following sensational finds of large and bizarre trilobites in the Moroccan desert near Alnif, Erfoud and Tabourikt over the last three decades a whole trilobite industry evolved. This happened in an area where education was scarce and the availability of electricity and running water restricted. Native Moroccans and nomads found a welcomed, if not their only income in searching for and preparing trilobites. Over the years, trilobites have become an important economical factor in the generally rather poor areas of the High Atlas mountain range.

According to BURKHARD & BODE (2003), there are well-known manufacturers in Morocco who produce fake trilobites or rather trilobite models. Fossil dealers who go to Morocco to buy trilobites are well aware of that and know that these trilobites are not real. Neither are these models sold to them as real trilobites but reproductions. The cheating does not start there, it starts when these reproductions are thrown onto the trilobite market in masses and sold as the real stuff for little money. Faking of this nature started in the 80s due to increasing demand for giant Paradoxides and lack of the real thing. In the beginning the old “make-one-out-of-many” was common, but very soon whole trilobites were faked. It is verified that it was not the Moroccans who started to fake trilobites but American as well as European dealers who inspired them to do so. The dealers then sold the fake trilobites as the real thing. Meanwhile the faking has reached levels that include almost any known Moroccan trilobite species and it is possible that there is more false material floating around at this time than real.

But the repairing, restoring or faking is not restricted to Morocco. It applies as well to some of the Russian trilobites coming from the St. Petersburg region, although the amount of faking is not comparable to that in Morocco. The reconstructions are usually restricted to replacing missing parts of the exoskeleton, fixing broken-off eyes and spines (every once in a while a whole pygidium may be replaced), waxing and colouring of the cuticle or the mounting of isolated trilobites onto matrix other than the one it was found in. I experienced this myself when trying to prepare the hypostome of a Dysplanus from the Lower Ordovician. The trilobite was completely real but mounted artificially onto a piece of matrix from the Asery level. Most likely it was done because a trilobite on a nice piece of matrix sells for a much higher price than an isolated specimen. From a scientist’s point of view it looked as if this species from the Kunda level had still existed in the younger Asery level, which is not the case.
It has to be said, though, that the Russian preparators rarely play dirty. The trilobites are real but in most cases (Asaphus, Illaenus) are very quickly extruded from the matrix with high-powered blasters using very aggressive media so that the exoskeleton gets an unnatural shine. They look very nice when finished, but have most likely been polished and waxed and thereby lost surface detail. Looking at more carefully prepared specimens you will find the characteristic surface details, little inconsistencies produced by nature but lost in specimens that have been blasted too aggressively. The more rare spiny trilobites like Hoplolichas, Boedaspis, Paraceraurus and so on are for the most part very carefully and skilfully prepared and therefore very expensive.
Fake trilobites are known even from Bolivia. I have not had a chance yet to take a look at such material myself but we have been assured that there are assembled trilobites on the market as well as complete fakes made of plaster or resin including both positives and negatives. So watch out!

 

Some hints as to identifying fake Moroccan trilobites

1. air bubbles in matrix and exoskeleton as signs of resins.

If you discover tiny holes in the matrix or the trilobite exoskeleton you can assume you are dealing with a fake trilobite. These tiny holes, usually less than 0,5 mm in diameter, are the results of bursting bubbles of air that formed during the hardening process of the resin used to cast the trilobite. (see Picture1).

Picture 1: A) simple fake, a Phacops trilobite completely made of resin, the cast trilobite then mounted onto the matrix, the tiny holes in the resin surface can be easily seen. B) magnified view of part of the axis. C) air bubbles in the matrix of a faked Dicranurus indicate that the trilobite including underlying false matrix has been mounted onto a piece of real rock, the resin shows an unnatural brown colour, real matrix should be of a dark grey.

2. differences in matrix colour frequently with cast trilobites

If you find different colours in the matrix of Devonian trilobites, for example a light brown close to the trilobite while the rock, once you turn it over, is of a dark grey, this indicates there may be trouble ahead. Usually the rock is of an evenly dark grey (Hamar L’Aghdad), reddish or light yellow (Laatchana) colour. So, if there are differences in colour as described and in addition to that very extensive preparation marks on the surface (to hide tiny holes), then both the trilobite and an underlying layer most likely were cast and later mounted on some real piece of rock.
In Cambrian giant trilobites you can sometimes find colour variations of the matrix that may indicate that the specimen was assembled from different individuals. Look for thin lines were parts may have been glued together and their respective colours. Trilobites without tampering should have an evenly levelled and coloured matrix.

Picture 2: complete fake of a spiny Moroccan trilobite, Dicranurus monstrosus. The trilobite plus an underlying layer were cast from brown resin and then mounted on top of real rock. The “trilobite” was then painted, the surrounding areas covered with preparation marks. The saw proved it! Notice the hole underneath the “trilobite” and the colour difference between the brown resin layer on top and the real rock beneath which is grey. Photo taken by Sonntag, sawed up by Horst Burkhard.

3. crack line in Devonian trilobites as an indication of authenticity

If you cannot find any crack line in Devonian trilobites that can be followed on throughout the surrounding matrix then be suspicious. These crack lines are characteristic for authentic trilobites from the very hard rocks of the Devonian of Morocco. It is hard to find a trilobite without splitting it with your hammer. The absence of a crack line may be an indication of a fake trilobite so take a close look.

4. colour and substance of the trilobite exoskeleton

The exoskeleton of most Moroccan trilobites is of black, in some rare cases of dark brown colour. Many faked trilobites show different colours, often brownish, with an unnatural shine to it. Making careful use of your front teeth, you can test the trilobite for authenticity. Fake trilobites will feel “soft”, like plastics. This method is simple and safe at the same time, because the nerves in your teeth are sensitive enough to tell the difference without damaging the specimen. Authentic trilobites are much harder than faked ones made of resin. Try it using your toothbrush and some piece of rock. But please be careful, a slight touch will do, don’t try and bite into it!
As far as trilobites from the Ordovician and Cambrian of Morocco are concerned, their exoskeleton has been replaced with hydrated iron oxides like lemonite, the colour being a shade of brown rather than yellow or black, as has been seen in some faked trilobites.

Picture 3: these trilobites are authentic specimens, for only if you know what real trilobites look like will you be able to identify the faked ones. The Paralejurus on the left shows the characteristic crack lines of a Devonian trilobite (marked by arrows), the upper one clearly visible on the cephalon, the lower one not so obvious. Top right: clearly visible terrace lines on the pygidium of the Paralejurus. These lines will be missing in faked trilobites or specimens that have been treated too aggressively with a blaster. Notice the tiny white spots, they are preparation marks resulting from direct hits with the tip of the prep needle. But, of course, they will also be gone once a blaster has been used in the manner described. Bottom right: the individual eye lenses of trilobites of the order Phacopida are a sign of authenticity because they are (still) hard to fake. It should be noticed, though, that schizochroal eyes are peculiar to the Phacopina, which are abundant in the Devonian of Morocco but of course there are other trilobites as well (Lichida, Harpetida, Proetida).

5. morphological characteristics, surface details and trilobite eyes

The exoskeletons of real trilobites very often show fine structures, inconsistencies and ornamentations, there are terrace lines (see the Paralejurus above), little knots, knobs and spines. Taking a close look at the trilobites’ eyes will be helpful as, e.g., the Phacopina have schizochroal eyes, the individual lenses clearly visible to the naked eye. Faked trilobites usually lack these characteristic details … it is hard to copy nature perfectly. Faked Phacopina usually have smooth eye surfaces, because the production method of cast trilobites does not allow for such details to be reproduced.

6. UV-lights and solvents as tools to identify resin

If you are not sure whether you are dealing with a fake trilobite a UV-light may be of assistance. Resin reflects ultraviolet light and therefore starts gleaming when exposed to a UV source. A real trilobite is mineralized, it has the same reflection habits as the surrounding matrix. Be careful, however, when testing waxed or finished trilobites like those coming from Russia, they may start gleaming under UV light and still be “real”. Waxing and finishing is a commonly used method to increase contrast or conceal minor damages to the exoskeleton.
Moroccan trilobites sometimes are covered with an unidentifiable black paste, both real specimens and faked ones. We use a solvent like Aceton or Bindulin to remove such patinas from trilobites. Take a paintbrush and confront your trilobite with the solvent and within seconds the paste will come off, so do other artificial colourings. Use the solvent on real trilobites to remove the paste and see what remains ….. perhaps not too much, if you are unlucky. If there are restored areas they will appear white because the colour came of.

7. The ultimate and final solution – the saw!

If you are still in doubt about the authenticity of your trilobite then saw it up with an appropriate saw (diamond-covered blade). There is a hypostome? Bad luck, chances are you just sawed up a real trilobite! There is a hollow area underneath the trilobite and resin has been used? Then your trilobite was fake. But it should not be necessary to saw up your specimen unless you want to prove its lack of value 100%.

Picture 4: a completely faked Burmeisterella, the hole underneath the cast trilobite can be easily seen, the use of a shiny finish to pretend a real trilobite exoskeleton is evident. This fake was 25 cm in length. Photograph taken by Sonntag, specimen owned and sawed up by Burkhard.

 

 

Examples of faked Moroccan trilobites

Unnatural trilobite assemblages

Frequently seen on shows are the combinations of various faked trilobites on a single plate. I call this a “faked assemblage” (see pic. 5). These plates tend to be circular in shape, thin and slightly hollow. I have even seen clocks mounted to the center, surrounded by cast trilobites. There are simply no such assemblages in nature. This does not mean there cannot be several authentic specimens on a single plate, it simply means there are no such natural parties of different species that often do not even appear in the same geological formation.

Picture 5: completely faked trilobite assemblages, all made of resin with an underlying layer and mounted onto real rock, casts identified as: Leonaspis, Walliserops, Crotalocephalus, Paralejurus, and something unidentified on top (left image),Odontochile, Psychopyge, Phacops and Scutellum (right image). Photography: Sonntag, specimens owned and sawed up by Burkhard.

The "Homalonotida"-Fake or
Trilobites that do not exist

Some of the most impressive fakes coming from Morocco are the complete "Burmeisterellas" (Picture 6). To the best of our knwoledge, unto this day no authentic complete specimen of this genera has actually been found in den Devonian of Morocco, making it more difficult to tell fakes from the real thing. It has to be said that all complete specimens we saw so far turned out to show manipulations, at least. Burmeisterella belongs to the Homalonotidae, close relatives to the Calymenia. The partial remains of these large trilobites are found isolated in the Devonian of Morocco. There do not seem to be complete specimens. They make for very impressive trilobites and it is no wonder that inventive Moroccans took all the parts they could find - cephalons, pygidias, pleurae, etc.- and assembled them to form what they believed would represent a complete specimen of this genera. They just took every rock that was found to contain parts of these Burmeisterellas, extracted the parts completely from the surrounding matrix and collected them until they had everything they needed to assemble a trilobite. According to Mr. Burkhard the Moroccans exchange missing parts among each other: "I need pygidia of this spiny trilobite and I have pleurae of that species that you are looking for, let's make a deal."

Picture 6: The "Homalonotida"-Fake. A: Spiny Burmeisterella sp.? (Spines are actually tiny Orthocerata glued onto the exoskeleton, real trilobite parts are assembled and fixed with resin onto a prepared piece of real matrix. B: Smooth Burmeisterella sp.? Cephalon and pygididum of this trilobite consist of real trilobite parts, the throrax section marked by the red lines is made of resin. Both faked specimens are approximately 25 cms in length. Photos: Sonntag, B: Photo from the collection of Burkhard. P.S. In 2002 Heiko and me saw these "trilobites" for the first time and were both fooled.

Once they have all the parts they need - real parts but coming from various individuals - they will take them and place them one by one onto a piece of prepared matrix, most likely specially made from the Devonian of Morocco, using resins and plaster. There seems to be a spiny and a non-spiny type of Burmeisterella. The first one, however, if it does exist in nature at all, was in our case faked by glueing tiny Orthocerata (the tiny shells of a kind of cephalopoda) onto the exoskeleton in order to mock real spines. We have been assured by Mr. Burkhard that these Orthocerata have been found in certain places in such masses that they are used frequently now to mock spines of all sorts, making it much easier to produce fakes. In former times the mock spines had to be made from plastics, it is much more comfortable using the tiny Nautiloids. So once the "trilobite" has been assembled the Orhocerata are glued onto the cephalon, thorax, pleurae and pygidium and there you go - a fantastic looking trilobite, wow! Well, in the end most of the material used to produce the trilobite is authentic, it is just that it does not come from the same individual. There are, however, cases in which only the cephalon and pygidium are real and the thorax made of resin as can bee seen in Picture 6-B.
The quality of these fakes can be very good, at least the trilobites look very impressive! Some of the less sophisticated fakes - mostly of the smooth kind of Burmeisterella in a brownish color - often show unnatural distances between the pleurae (see Picture 7-A), the matrix in between looking carved. The first time we saw this it already looked sort of suspicious to us but we could not be sure until we saw the sawed-up pieces (see Picture 7-C) of Mr. Burkhard during the Hamburg Fair's special exhibition on faked trilobites in December of 2003.)

Picture 7: more examples of faked Homalonotida from Morocco. A: the red stripes mark the resin in between the assembled pleurae, the right side of the pygidium was most likley broken off, so the right pleurae were shortened in order to pretend that the trilobite was still partially buried inside the matrix. B: cutting right through the "trilobite", the red lines and spots marking areas made of resin, the whole thorax, the free cheeks and the anterior border are faked and made of resin. C: a sawed up spiny Homalonotid, the spines are actually tiny Othocerata, real trilobite parts appear yellowish while the resin looks grey. Debris of rock has been mixed with the plaster used to save material. All photographs taken by Sonntag, trilobites belonging to and sawed up by Burkhard.

 

Fakes of giant Cambrian trilobites

The giant Paradoxidae from the Cambrian of Morocco are well-known and sought-after trilobites worldwide. It does not surprise that these trilobites have become the subject of extensive faking activities. The demand is satisfied by producing false material either assembled from isolated trilobite parts or completely made of resin or plaster. These fakes now seem to represent the major part of the Paradoxidae traded and it is not that easy to acquire the real thing. At the same time it has become more and more difficult to identify fakes (see Picture 8-A), although there are still some very bad ones around that can be easily told (see Picture 8-C), faking is an art itself!

Picture 8: All Paradoxidae that can be seen here are fake! A: Acadoparadoxides briareus Geyer 1993: brown-yellowish painted cast trilobite, about 25 cms in length, fixed into an artificial mould using resins, the arrows marking a crack where the cast and the rock did not completely glue together, the circle marking an area where the artisan working on the cast failed the natural symmetry of the pleurae, it is quite certain that fakes of this nature have been sold in the past. B: Cambropallas telesto GEYER 1993: The same disintegration between cast and matrix can be seen in this image (red circle), the pleural tips have been created way too long and tipped (should look like the pleurae to the left), the whole trilobite about 15 cms in length. C: very primitive fake of Cambropallas, perhaps the rear section of the axis is real but everything else is made of resin or plaster, the glabellar furrows carved into the cast, proportions inadequate compared to the real thing. D: the cast has completely disintegrated from the mould it was placed in. Photos taken by Sonntag, Photographs A, B, D: collection Burkhard.

How can you tell fakes? For the most part the trilobites are made of resin or plaster using negatives of real Paradoxidae, painted and then fixed into a mould dug into a real piece of Cambrian matrix. Because of the inadequate glueing between the materials used the cast very often partially disintegrates from the rock and tiny cracks appear along the cast/matrix-line (see Picture 8, A-B) or the cast disintegrates from the rock alltogether and the whole construction falls apart (see Picture 8-D). As far as the cast itself is concerned the same criteria als already mentioned in the chapters on Devonian trilobites apply. The casts often look very smooth and symmetric, preparation marks and at least smaller damages that should be present in real fossils are missing. There are neither cracks or missing areas to the exoskeleton, remains of matrix between the pleurae or the characteristic features of the exoskeleton surface (e. g. the small tubercles on the exoskeleton of Cambropallas or terrace lines on the free cheeks of Acadoparadoxides trilobites). The natural color of the Cambrian Paradoxidae very often is being imitated by using a brown-yellowish paste that does not exactly match the real thing. Many fake trilobites show a suspicious shade of yellow. The original exoskeleton of Cambrian trilobites has usually been replaced over time with hydrated iron oxides (often lemonite) of red and brown color or yellow and brown, therefore black Cambrian trilobites have surely been the subject of manipulation, painted over to cover restorations, etc, and to create a "better contrast".

 

Evolution in Moroccan fakes - from simple casts to imitations of matrix

The early times of trilobite fakes saw Moroccans carving trilobites out of pieces of rock, which sometimes led to very odd results due to the lack of morphological knowledge to produce convincing fakes (see Picture 9-A). In the beginning (and perhaps still today to fool tourists) not only trilobites were reproduced but scorpions and even snakes including zig-zag lines were carved out of and/or nto the rock. I have seen huge wheels of ammonites completely fake. In most cases, though, only the inner circles of the ammonites, which are usually missing in real findings, are restored. Well, maybe the artisan had a good day and turned the piece of rock he was sitting on into a nice huge ammonite - surely he will find a buyer for it.
As already stated the early fakes of trilobites were very primitive, made of a little plaster or resin and the details formed using a tool of sorts and before the material hardened. At times this resulted in fantasy trilobites with large numbers of thorax segments or cephalons and pygidia that would not fit and/or were morphologically incorrect. Perhaps the "trilobites" were created out of memory or from bad sketches. The problem, apart form the sometimes ridiculous morphology, was that the border between cast material and real matrix could be easily told. Because of that, the artisans very soon adopted the procedure to cover the whole chunk of rock with a layer of resin or plaster mixed with crumbled rock and perhaps a little color into which the cast trilobite is placed (see Picture 9 B-D). The trilobite is made by casting resin into a negative. The hardened imitation is then placed into the artifical layer and once the whole construction is hardened the border line between fake trilobite and fake matrix as well as the line between fake matrix and real rock is covered by extensive preparation marks to deceive the unwary eye and cover tiny holes resulting from bursting bubbles of gas in the hardening material. However these preparation marks are very often way too irregular. After that the whole creation is painted, often failing the right color shades. The whole process of faking the trilobite takes two hours perhaps (excluding the hardening process that can take several hours to complete). A real trilobite, depending on the kind of trilobite and the skill of the artisan prepping it, will take at least 5 hours or more to complete, perfectly prepared specimens may have seen 100 hours or more.

Picture 9: A: fantasy trilobite pretending to be a Phacopida from the early times of trilobite fakes (piece was acquired in 1983). B-D: good reproduction of Odontochile from the Lower Devonian of Morocco, produced 20 years later. Apart from the missing eye detail (lenses) the "trilobite" is morphologically correct and detailed but being cast and fixed onto a layer of resin or plaster on top of real rock. Photo B, bottom right, clearly shows an area of disintegration of the artificial layer from the matrix. Photos C and D show the smooth surface of the eyes, eye detail is missing, there are no lenses as with authentic specimens.

Psychopyge - beloved and frequently faked

This impressive trilobite from the Lower Devonian deposits of Morocco with its strange extension of the cephalon is very popular with collectors and therefore frequently subject to manipulation and fake. Authentic specimens bear three rows of very fine spines (one row on the axis and one row on each side at the borderline between pleurae and pleural spines). Preparing these spines is very time-consuming and difficult work and a specimen perfectly prepared will cost a small fortune (4-digit sum in €, perhaps). But you will get fakes for 30 €! So if you are looking for cheap material be very careful when coming across Psychopyge trilobites! A few years ago an acquaintance of ours very proudly presented one of these specimens to us and was very disappointed when - after carefully investigating the trilobite under magnification - we had to tell him that it was fake. Because of its bizarre morphology Psychopyge is also very popular with the general public on fairs, which may be one reason why this trilobite is frequemtly found on the fake trilobite assemblages mentioned. And cast single pieces with mock matrix have been selling for years.
When we have a look at the faked Psychopyge in picture 10 below, what we notice is not only the brownish color and the many tiny bubble holes in the resin but the very crude preparation marks. You can tell a good preparator by the way he "cleans up" his workplace, namely the matrix surrounding the finished trilobite. A good preparator will try and give beauty not only to the trilobite but to the matrix as well by evenly roughening it and giving it a nice light color or by carefully blasting it after which it becomes a nice grey. The procedure also increases contrast between the fossil and the matrix. The intention to create something really beautiful is not too common with the people faking trilobites so keep your hands off stuff that does not look good.

Picture 10: not too good a fake of Psychopyge elegans from the Devonian deposits of Morocco. Just another matrix imitation and a cast trilobite on top, both the trilobite and the underlying matrix werde made of resin. A: very suspicious is the brownish-grey color of the trilobite (black would be normal), the surface of the exoskeleton is rough and full of bubble holes. B: magnified view of the cephalon - both eyes and glabella seem to have been somewhat carelessly modelled. C: the resin pleurae have obviously been carved a little, resulting in a sharp-looking appearance, again: note the bubble holes! D. the tail spines seem to have been carved as well with some sharp modeling tool, bubble holes again in both the "trilobite" exoskeleton and the underlying "matrix". Photography: Sonntag (We found this piece with a Moroccon dealer on a German fossil show).

Dicranurus monstrosus - a frequently faked horned trilobite

This trilobite has one of the most bizarre morphologies coming from the Lower Devonian of Morocco. Remarkable are the two very promiment horns on the occipital ring. The trilobite is rare and rather difficult to prepare. At least you cannot prepare this trilobite with simple tools as have been used in Morocco early on. The difficult preparation may be one reason why there are so many fales floating around, another being that this trilobite usually represents the more expensive kind of fossil. As already mentioned the crude preparation marks indicate an old-style Moroccan preparation and should already raise a red flag. In many cases the matrix (or resin with faked trilobites) in between the horns has not been removed (see Pic. 11) If the matrix shows a light brown color and the exoskeleton a shade of brown (straight black would be normal) then chances are you are dealing with a fake specimen.
Like with the other trilobites we discussed the fakes of Dicranurus mostly consist of both the trilobite and a matrix layer being cast from resin or plaster and then glued on top of a chunk of real matrix, the typical "imitated-matrix-fake". Among all the faked trilobites of this species I have never seen one with the matrix removed and the horns standing free. That does not mean there are no real trilobites with matrix in between the horns, it simply means that well-prepared trilobites of this species frequently show free-standing horns.

Pic. 11: A typical Dicranurus monstrosus fake , about 10 cms in length. A cast trilobite and a cast layer of matrix glued onto a chunk of real matrix. 1: frontal view of Dicranurus, clearly visible are the crude prep marks pretending to be the real thing. 2: the pygidium under magnification. Note the circled tiny holes resulting from bursting bubbles of gas during the hardening process. 3: The pleurae have obviously been manipulated using a sharp carving tool, the pleurae looking very sharp, real ones are circular in shape. 4: cephalon under magnification: note the partially removed color from the left horn to prove the fake and reveal the light color of the resin used.

Acanthopyge - Advanced Faking !